祖源树 Login Scientific Ancients Papers

Population discontinuity in the Paris Basin linked to evidence of the Neolithic Decline

PRJEB95770 Original Paper / DOI2026-04-03179 samples (study)

AI interpretationAI-generated

Paris Basin burials reveal a genetic break after the Neolithic decline.

Ancient DNA from 132 individuals at Bury, near Paris, shows two burial phases separated by a gap. The earlier phase, before 3000 BC, and the later phase, after 2900 BC, were genetically distinct. The later group likely arrived from southern France, moving north after the Neolithic decline. This turnover, along with disease and forest regrowth, may explain why megalith building stopped.

Sample interpretation

The site yielded 179 samples, with 122 resolved Y-haplogroups. The most common Y lineage is I-L160 (31), followed by H-Y19956 (11) and R-L51 (8). Mitochondrial DNA is dominated by J1c1 (9) and K1a4a1 (8). These lineages reflect the genetic makeup of the two distinct burial groups.

For genealogy enthusiasts

For ancestry enthusiasts, this shows that even in western Europe, the Neolithic decline led to local population replacement, not just continuity. It highlights how ancient DNA can reveal hidden migrations and social changes.

Abstract

At the transition between the third and the fourth millennium BC, there is evidence for a population decline concurrent with the end of megalith building across continental northwestern Europe. In Scandinavia this ‘Neolithic decline’ is followed by a massive population turnover, as farming communities disappeared and were replaced by people with steppe ancestry. In western Europe, however, ancestry associated with Neolithic farmers persisted beyond the Neolithic decline, and it remains unclear whether a similar demographic replacement occurred. To investigate the population dynamics around the Neolithic decline in present-day France, we sequenced 132 ancient genomes from the allée sépulcrale at Bury. Located in the Paris area, Bury spans two burial phases separated by a hiatus with no burial activity: one phase directly preceding the Neolithic decline in the late fourth millennium BC, ending around 3000 BC, and a later phase some time after the Neolithic decline in the early- to mid-third millennium BC. Our analysis revealed that the two burial phases at Bury represented largely discontinuous genetic groups of a markedly different social organization as inferred from three large pedigrees. We show that the difference between the two burial phases can be linked to a northwards movement of Neolithic ancestry from the south, which only spread into the Paris Basin after the Neolithic decline, at around 2900 BC. Together with genetic evidence of various infectious diseases in the dataset, such as Yersinia pestis and Borrelia recurrentis, as well as evidence for forest regrowth between the two phases, these findings detail a population turnover at the end of the fourth millennium BC, offering a possible explanation for the cessation of megalith building.

Samples & Data on TheYtree

179samples on site
122Y haplogroup resolved
1archaeological sites

Sample Map

Map tiles by TheYtree · dot size = number of samples

Paternal (Y-DNA) Haplogroups

HaplogroupSamples
I-L160 31
H-Y19956 11
R-L51 8
I-M423 8
H-BY87974 7
H-Z19117 6
I-A1150 5
R-P310 3
I-L1297 3
H-Y19966 2
I-CTS1758 2
I-M438 2

Maternal (mtDNA) Haplogroups

Sample Highlights More samples →

SampleY-DNAmtDNACulture / Period
BUR170 I-L160 V10 · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?
BUR174 H-Y19956 J1c1 · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?
BUR176 H-BY87974 J2b1a · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?
BUR177 I-L160 K1a3a · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?
BUR179 I-L1286 H1c · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?
BUR182 I-L1297 K1a2c · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?
BUR184 I-CTS1758 U3a1 · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?
BUR185 H-Y19962 U5b1-T16189C! · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?
BUR186 H-Z19117 H1q · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?
BUR189 H-BY87974 J1c1 · Neolithic 6000-4000BP?