祖源树 Login Scientific Ancients Papers

The genomic origins of the Bronze Age Tarim Basin mummies

PRJEB46875 Original Paper / DOI2021-10-2727 samples (study)

AI interpretationAI-generated

Ancient DNA reveals Tarim mummies were local, not Afanasievo migrants.

This study analyzed genomes from 5 Dzungarian individuals (c. 3000–2800 BC) and 13 Tarim individuals (c. 2100–1700 BC). Dzungarian individuals had mainly Afanasievo ancestry plus local input, while Tarim individuals had only local ancestry. Dental calculus from Xiaohe showed milk proteins, indicating dairy pastoralism. These results reject previous hypotheses that Tarim mummies were Proto-Tocharian speakers from Afanasievo or BMAC cultures. Instead, Tarim cultures arose from a genetically isolated local population that adopted neighboring pastoralist and agriculturalist practices.

Sample interpretation

The dataset includes 27 samples: 20 from Xiaohe culture and 7 from Afanasievo culture. Y-chromosome haplogroups resolved for 6 samples: R-FTK22 (n=2), Q-M378 (n=1), R-FT303220 (n=1), Q-F2235 (n=1), R-M12149 (n=1). Mitochondrial haplogroups: C4 (n=8), R1b1 (n=2), C4m1 (n=2), D5a2 (n=2), A5a (n=1), T2d1a (n=1). Sites include Xiaohe (n=14, 3, 3) and Afanasievo (n=4, 2, 1).

For genealogy enthusiasts

For ancestry enthusiasts, this clarifies that the Tarim mummies were not migrants from the steppe or BMAC, but a local population. It highlights the importance of local continuity and cultural adoption in Inner Asian prehistory.

Abstract

The identity of the earliest inhabitants of Xinjiang, in the heart of Inner Asia, and the languages that they spoke have long been debated and remain contentious1. Here we present genomic data from 5 individuals dating to around 3000–2800 BC from the Dzungarian Basin and 13 individuals dating to around 2100–1700 BC from the Tarim Basin, representing the earliest yet discovered human remains from North and South Xinjiang, respectively. We find that the Early Bronze Age Dzungarian individuals exhibit a predominantly Afanasievo ancestry with an additional local contribution, and the Early–Middle Bronze Age Tarim individuals contain only a local ancestry. The Tarim individuals from the site of Xiaohe further exhibit strong evidence of milk proteins in their dental calculus, indicating a reliance on dairy pastoralism at the site since its founding. Our results do not support previous hypotheses for the origin of the Tarim mummies, who were argued to be Proto-Tocharian-speaking pastoralists descended from the Afanasievo1,2 or to have originated among the Bactria–Margiana Archaeological Complex3 or Inner Asian Mountain Corridor cultures4. Instead, although Tocharian may have been plausibly introduced to the Dzungarian Basin by Afanasievo migrants during the Early Bronze Age, we find that the earliest Tarim Basin cultures appear to have arisen from a genetically isolated local population that adopted neighbouring pastoralist and agriculturalist practices, which allowed them to settle and thrive along the shifting riverine oases of the Taklamakan Desert.

Samples & Data on TheYtree

27samples on site
6Y haplogroup resolved
6archaeological sites

Sample Map

Map tiles by TheYtree · dot size = number of samples

Paternal (Y-DNA) Haplogroups

HaplogroupSamples
R-FTK22 2
R-FT303220 1
Q-F2235 1
R-M12149 1
Q-M378 1

Maternal (mtDNA) Haplogroups

Sample Highlights More samples →

SampleY-DNAmtDNACulture / Period
11KBM1 R-FTK22 C4 Xiaohe 小河文化· Early Middle Bronze Age 1876-1839 calBC
AYIM22BY Q-M378 U5a1a1 Afanasievo 阿凡纳谢沃文化· Early Bronze Age 2843-2811 calBC
G218M5-2 R-M12149 H15b1 Afanasievo 阿凡纳谢沃文化· Early Bronze Age 2907-2851 calBC
G218M5-3N Q-F2235 U5a1-T16192C! Afanasievo 阿凡纳谢沃文化· Early Bronze Age 3005-2987 calBC
L5209 R-FT303220 C4k Xiaohe 小河文化· Early Middle Bronze Age 4000-3800 BP
L5213 R-FTK22 R1b1 Xiaohe 小河文化· Early Middle Bronze Age 4000-3800 BP