Ancient DNA reveals Tarim mummies were local, not Afanasievo migrants.
This study analyzed genomes from 5 Dzungarian individuals (c. 3000–2800 BC) and 13 Tarim individuals (c. 2100–1700 BC). Dzungarian individuals had mainly Afanasievo ancestry plus local input, while Tarim individuals had only local ancestry. Dental calculus from Xiaohe showed milk proteins, indicating dairy pastoralism. These results reject previous hypotheses that Tarim mummies were Proto-Tocharian speakers from Afanasievo or BMAC cultures. Instead, Tarim cultures arose from a genetically isolated local population that adopted neighboring pastoralist and agriculturalist practices.
The dataset includes 27 samples: 20 from Xiaohe culture and 7 from Afanasievo culture. Y-chromosome haplogroups resolved for 6 samples: R-FTK22 (n=2), Q-M378 (n=1), R-FT303220 (n=1), Q-F2235 (n=1), R-M12149 (n=1). Mitochondrial haplogroups: C4 (n=8), R1b1 (n=2), C4m1 (n=2), D5a2 (n=2), A5a (n=1), T2d1a (n=1). Sites include Xiaohe (n=14, 3, 3) and Afanasievo (n=4, 2, 1).
For ancestry enthusiasts, this clarifies that the Tarim mummies were not migrants from the steppe or BMAC, but a local population. It highlights the importance of local continuity and cultural adoption in Inner Asian prehistory.
Map tiles by TheYtree · dot size = number of samples
| Haplogroup | Samples | |
|---|---|---|
| R-FTK22 | 2 | |
| R-FT303220 | 1 | |
| Q-F2235 | 1 | |
| R-M12149 | 1 | |
| Q-M378 | 1 |
| Sample | Y-DNA | mtDNA | Culture / Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11KBM1 | R-FTK22 | C4 | Xiaohe 小河文化· Early Middle Bronze Age 1876-1839 calBC |
| AYIM22BY | Q-M378 | U5a1a1 | Afanasievo 阿凡纳谢沃文化· Early Bronze Age 2843-2811 calBC |
| G218M5-2 | R-M12149 | H15b1 | Afanasievo 阿凡纳谢沃文化· Early Bronze Age 2907-2851 calBC |
| G218M5-3N | Q-F2235 | U5a1-T16192C! | Afanasievo 阿凡纳谢沃文化· Early Bronze Age 3005-2987 calBC |
| L5209 | R-FT303220 | C4k | Xiaohe 小河文化· Early Middle Bronze Age 4000-3800 BP |
| L5213 | R-FTK22 | R1b1 | Xiaohe 小河文化· Early Middle Bronze Age 4000-3800 BP |