祖源树 Login Scientific Ancients Papers

Ancient DNA reveals diverse community organizations in the 5th millennium BCE Carpathian Basin

PRJEB86386 Original Paper / DOI2025-04-16110 samples (study)

AI interpretationAI-generated

Ancient DNA reveals two contrasting kinship systems in nearby Copper Age communities.

This study analyzed 125 ancient genomes from the Carpathian Basin (4800-3900 BCE). Despite shifts in culture and burial, genetic continuity persisted. One large cemetery was genetically diverse, while another site, only 100 km away, was homogeneous with close kin, patrilineality, and patrilocality. These contemporaneous communities used similar material culture but had radically different social structures.

Sample interpretation

The site_samples count is 21 Y-chromosome samples from five sites. Y haplogroups include R-P310 (5), H-P96 (2), E-L618 (2), I-CTS6414 (2), and others. Mitochondrial haplogroups include T2b (3), J1c (2), and various U and J subtypes. The largest site sample is I7132.SG with 11 individuals, followed by I5114 (5) and I5105 (3). These genetic markers reflect the paternal and maternal lineages present in these communities.

For genealogy enthusiasts

For ancestry enthusiasts, this shows that ancient communities living close together could have very different kinship rules. Your genetic matches may reflect patrilocal or exogamous practices, so interpreting ancient DNA requires site-specific context, not just broad cultural labels.

Abstract

We present a comprehensive genetic investigation of Late Neolithic and Early Copper Age populations living in the Carpathian Basin, leveraging whole genome data from 125 previously unreported individuals. Using population genetics, kinship analyses and the study of networks of identity-by-descent haplotype segment sharing, we elucidate the social and genetic dynamics of these communities between 4800-3900 cal BCE. Despite changes in settlement patterns, burial practices, and material culture, we document a high degree of genetic continuity. While one set of individuals we analyzed from a large community cemetery was genetically diverse, another site was more homogenous and closed, with numerous consanguineous relationships and evidence of patrilineality and patrilocality. These results document radically different kinship systems in contemporaneous Early Copper Age communities using similar material culture and living only about 100 km apart.

Samples & Data on TheYtree

36samples on site
35Y haplogroup resolved
7archaeological sites

Sample Map

Map tiles by TheYtree · dot size = number of samples

Paternal (Y-DNA) Haplogroups

HaplogroupSamples
R-P310 5
E-L618 4
I-Z161 3
I-CTS6414 2
R-Y127541 2
H-P96 2
R-L20 2
G-FTB28416 1
C-F16270 1
G-PF3359 1
C-Z29331 1
C-V3918 1

Maternal (mtDNA) Haplogroups

Sample Highlights More samples →

SampleY-DNAmtDNACulture / Period
I4089.SG C-Z29331 J1c · 6120 BP
I7127.SG R-Y127541 U5a2d · 6005 BP
I16530.SG E-L618 T2c1d-T152C! · 6755 BP
I5115.SG R-L20 H7c · 6515 BP
I7128.SG R-L20 J1c2 · 6045 BP
I16541.SG G-Y45004 — · 6720 BP
I16543.SG I-CTS11871 T2b · 6715 BP
I5110.SG I-BY90070 N1a1a1 · 6815 BP
I7136 C-F16270 H · 6075 BP
I2791_enhanced I-PF3923 U5a1c1 · 5523 BP