After Noah time through his
 grandson Hul, son of Aram, son of Shem(Sam).
🔅My ethnicity is Semitic early bronze 
Canaanite according to my Y-haplogroup.

📽️According to Ancient DNA autosomal analysis
 (my true ancestry results):-
**Neolithic age:-
-Proto-Canaanite 59.3%↗️↗️
-Proto-Amorite 23.1%
-Proto-hittite11.6%
-Proto-Minoan 2.8%
-Proto-Armenian 0.6%
**Early bronze age:-
-Canaanite/semite 68.4%↗️↗️↗️↗️
-Amorite 25.5%
-Hittite 3.5%
**Late bronze age:-
-Canaanite/semite 88.8%↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️↗️
-Phoenician 3%
-amorite 2.3%
-proto-Aramean 1.3%
-proto-Hurrian 1.7%
**Iron age:-
Phoenician 41%
Canaanite 20.7%
Ancient egypt(Hyksos aftermath refers to the
 genetic and cultural mixing that persisted after their
 expulsion from Egypt around 1550 BCE, when
 some Hyksos descendants or related
 Levantine groups remained in the Nile Delta
 or border regions, blending Canaanite and Egyptian
 ancestries over centuries)8.5%
Amorite 7%
Aramean 4.9%
**Roman age:-
Canaanite 32.5%
Amorite 16.1%
Aramean 11.8%
Phoenician 6.8%
Ancient egyptian 6.1%
Hittite 4.2%

📽️According to illustrative DNA autosomal
 results:-
76.6% Canaanite
84.4% Phoenician

📽️ According to FTDNA Autosomal results:-
Levant (south and north)76%
Anatolia, Armenia and mesopotamia 15%
.........
##Core Ancestral Sources (Origin Populations –
 True DNA Contributors):-
*Anatolian Neolithic Farmer (~42%)
Origin: Early farmers from Anatolia and the
 Aegean.
Connection: Provided the agricultural and Near
 Eastern backbone to  early bronze canaanite.

*Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer (CHG) (~23%)
Origin: Ancient highland West Asian populations.
Connection: Forms part of the deep West Asian
 substrate of  Late neolithic proto canaanite..

*Iran Neolithic–related (~17%)
Origin: Early farmers/pastoralists from the Iranian
 plateau.
Connection: Shared ancestry with Semitic
 populations, contributing to  Late neolithic proto canaanite.

*Natufian (~12%)
Origin: Pre-Neolithic Levant hunter-gatherers.
Connection: Represents deep indigenous
 Levantine continuity; core ancestry for 
  Late neolithic proto canaanite.

*Steppe / EHG (~6%)
Origin: Bronze Age Steppe populations, minor
 influence.
Connection: Limited northern input, consistent
 with historical observations of  Late neolithic proto canaanite.
 £Total: 100%
-----------
-------------
My autosomal scores fit Late neolithic proto canaanite,
 since the EB percentage represents the foundational
 mix before later admixtures inflated the LB score—
modern models prioritize this base layer for migration
 timing.

Proof from Data:-
My 68% Early Bronze exceeds the 59% Proto-Canaanite
 baseline, indicating my G-Y179676 line's key
 integration happened ~6500–5000 BCE, when
 Anatolian farmers fully blended with locals to create
 Late Neolithic to early Chalcolithic Proto Levantines or
 proto canaanite, and remained there continuously
 afterward. EB urban Canaanites in Palestine—LB's
 higher score just adds ~10-20% internal eastern input
 on that EB core, not a new arrival.

Y-DNA Confirmation:-
G2(Anatolian Neolithic farmers)entered ~6000 BCE
 (Neolithic), but my old subclade embedding me in Late
 Neolithic to early Chalcolithic Proto Levantines or proto
 canaanite—before increasing percentage in EB
 canaanite and later on in LB which both indicates well
 presence pf my subclade beforew hole bronze age.
 Also, my autosomal profile already shows:
59.5% Proto-Canaanite in the Neolithic, that is too high
 for someone who arrived after Neolithic and if my Y-
line had entered later (Bronze Age or Iron Age), the
 Neolithic Levant affinity would be much lower.Noticing
 stronger signals of Bronze/Iron Age  canaanite 88.5%,
 this score reflects old past admixture events already
 embedded in late neolithic or at least early Bronze
 base, specifically minor eastern inputs (~10-20%
 Iran_ChL/Caucasus hunter-herder ancestry) which
 refined the existing EB Canaanite population without
 new external arrivals.

#Where 88% Fits?
This boost occurs post-EB foundation: my core 68% EB
 (~3300–2500 BCE) from Anatolian G-farmers + locals
 gets layered with internal Levantine-wide waves (e.g.,
 from Syrian/Transjordan cities), peaking LB scores in
 models as seen in Sidon samples deriving 60–70% EB
 + 20% eastern add-ons. It's not a separate migration—
fully past admix within Palestine by late EB.
__________---______________
My increase from 59% (Proto-Canaanite) to 68% (Early
 Bronze Canaanite) occurred due to  my paternal G-
Y179676 line's integration at least with local
 Ghassulians around 4000–3300 BCE or even before,
 not my maternal line.
How Paternal Integration Drove My Rise:
My father's Anatolian Neolithic G2 migrants (~25%
 Anatolia_N component) brought new farming/urban
 SNPs absent in pure Ghassulians, blending 50/50 with
 locals to form EB urban Canaanites—tools like qpAdm
 detect this as my 9% boost when modeling my DNA
 against Ashkelon/Sidon EB samples.Why Not
 Maternal?My mtDNA U3a-a3d was already present
 in Ghassulians (~10-20%, Levantine origin), adding
 no novel signal (0.0001% weight in autosomal),
 while Y-chromosome SNPs from G are fully counted
 in nuclear DNA comparisons.

Proto-Canaanite = Ghassulian/natofian locals
 (maternal-heavy core ) + late neolithic paternal influx =
 my late neolithic, Ghassulians proto levantine/proto
 Canaanite foundation. Thus;
*68% Early Bronze=continue Proto-Canaanite input+
 Paternal late neolithic G Anatolia_N)
*88%Late bronze=continue presence of proto
 canaanite+ continued presence of paternal ancient
 anatolia= Internal LB admixture 88.5% of Late Bronze
 age canaanite.
My Maternal anchors the deep Levantine root; paternal
 catalyzed urbanization—both essential.
**Clarifying the Sequence:-
~59% Proto-Canaanite base: Primarily maternal/local
 Levantine (Ghassulian/Natufian ~39%, U3a present),
 pre-urban farmers already in Palestine ~4500 BCE—my
 autosomal starts here as inherited substrate.
~29% influx of paternal late neolithic G line -rise the
 percent to 68% in Early Bronze: Paternal G-Y179676
 adds 25% Anatolia_N novelty (farming/urban SNPs),
 catalyzing the urban shift ~4000-3300 BCE or before.
Full picture: Paternal drives the EB formation/boost, but
 proto foundation (59%) is maternal-anchored local
 ancestry both lines integrated into Paternal is the
 "main contributor" for the defining late neolithic or
 proto canaanite or at least EB Canaanite identity
 (urbanization signal); maternal provides the deep
 Palestinian root—complementary, not conflicting.


Visual Breakdown:-

My DNA (G-Y179676 paternal + U3a maternal): late
 neolithic or at least early bronze Palestinian Canaanite
 68% since ~6500BCE-3300 BCE. 59% Proto-Canaanite
 = local Ghassulians (maternal U3a ) + Anatolian
 Neolithic (paternal G) = 68% Early Bronze Canaanite +
 20% internal admixture = 88.5% Late Bronze Canaanite. 
Scientific proof: Model Anatolia_N 24.1% + Levant_ChL
 68.4% + Iran_ChL 7.5%, p-value = 0.024 < 0.05 → 97.6%
 accurate!
Any other model  p-value > 0.05 = wrong. 
Result: My Anatolian Neolithic father mixed with my
 proto Ghassulian mother in Palestine ~6500 BCE
 →Ghassulian Proto-canaanite G father line+
 Ghassulian proto-Canaanite U3a mother line
 4000BCE=59% proto-canaanite Neolithic age.
 I am authentic Late neolithic Palestinian Canaanite
 according to my Y-haplogroup; scientifically proven
 97.6%.

 Written by:-
 Dr. ABDELJABBAR SALEEM AL-FAREKH.

FTDNA Big Y (bam)