📽️According to Ancient DNA autosomal analysis
 (my true ancestry results):-
**Neolithic age:-
-Proto-Canaanite 59.3%
-Proto-Amorite 23.1%
-Proto-hittite11.6%
-Proto-Minoan 2.8%
-Proto-Armenian 0.6%
**Early bronze age:-
-Canaanite/semite 68.4%
-Amorite 25.5%
-Hittite 3.5%
**Late bronze age:-
-Canaanite/semite 88.8%
-Phoenician 3%
-amorite 2.3%
-proto-Aramean 1.3%
-proto-Hurrian 1.7%
**Iron age:-
Phoenician 41%
Canaanite 20.7%
Ancient egypt(Hyksos aftermath refers to the
 genetic and cultural mixing that persisted after their
 expulsion from Egypt around 1550 BCE, when
 some Hyksos descendants or related
 Levantine groups remained in the Nile Delta
 or border regions, blending Canaanite and Egyptian
 ancestries over centuries)8.5%
Amorite 7%
Aramean 4.9%
**Roman age:-
Canaanite 32.5%
Amorite 16.1%
Aramean 11.8%
Phoenician 6.8%
Ancient egyptian 6.1%
Hittite 4.2%

📽️According to illustrative DNA autosomal
 results:-
76.6% Canaanite
84.4% Phoenician

📽️ According to FTDNA Autosomal results:-
Levant (south and north)76%
Anatolia, Armenia and mesopotamia 15%
.........

 
My autosomal DNA profile shows strongest genetic
 affinity to Levantine Chalcolithic and Bronze Age
 populations, which constitute the ancestral genetic
 substrate of historically attested Canaanite groups.
 Across multiple modeling approaches, my genome is
 best explained by a mixture dominated by Levantine
 Chalcolithic–related ancestry, supplemented by
 Anatolian Neolithic farmer, Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer
 (CHG), and Iran Neolithic–related components. This 
ancestry structure is consistent with published ancient 
DNA data from Early and Late Bronze Age Levantine 
samples, including those associated with urban 
Canaanite populations.


At deeper temporal resolution, the ancestry 
components detected—particularly Natufian-related 
Levantine ancestry alongside Anatolian Neolithic and 
Iran-related inputs—reflect population processes that 
occurred prior to or during the Chalcolithic and Early 
Bronze Age, rather than later historical migrations. 
These components form the well-documented genetic 
foundation of Bronze Age Levantine populations and 
persisted with limited external admixture through 
subsequent periods.
My Y-chromosome belongs to haplogroup G2, a lineage
 strongly associated with the Neolithic expansion of 
early farming populations from Anatolia into the Near 
East. Subclade G-Y179676 falls within a West Asian 
branch of G2 whose phylogenetic position is consistent
 with diversification during the Neolithic to Chalcolithic 
period. While no ancient genome has yet been directly 
assigned to this specific subclade, its broader 
haplogroup context and estimated age are compatible 
with populations present in the Levant prior to and
 during the Early Bronze Age. Consequently, this 
paternal lineage is consistent with, though not uniquely
 diagnostic of, the genetic background of ancient 
Levantine populations ancestral to later Canaanite 
groups.
My mitochondrial haplogroup (U3) likewise reflects 
deep Near Eastern ancestry observed in Chalcolithic 
and Bronze Age populations of the Levant and adjacent
 regions. While uniparental markers do not determine
 autosomal ancestry proportions, they are compatible
 with long-term West Asian population continuity.

Comparative autosomal modeling consistently places 
my genetic profile closest to Levantine Early and Late 
Bronze Age populations, with increasing affinity in Late 
Bronze Age models reflecting internal Levantine gene 
flow rather than evidence of a distinct external 
migration. This pattern mirrors published findings in 
which Late Bronze Age Levantine populations derive 
largely from earlier Early Bronze Age substrates, with 
modest eastern contributions layered onto an 
established local genetic base.

In summary, my genetic data indicate strong continuity
 with ancient Levantine populations ancestral to Bronze
 Age Canaanites, characterized by a stable West Asian 
ancestry profile formed during the Neolithic-to-Bronze 
Age transition. While genetic evidence cannot confirm 
cultural or ethnic identity, the results are inconsistent 
with recent European, Central Asian, or Turkic origins 
and instead support long-standing Levantine 
population continuity.

This is all what i reached via DNA until now Jan.2026.


 Written by:-
 Dr. ABDELJABBAR S AL-FAREKH.

FTDNA Big Y (bam)